Sunday, 14 March 2010

Naturalism as a Political Choice

Sociological Images write how women are being socialised to shave their legs, armpits and bikini area. The comment section of the same article had women revealing their feelings regarding shaving: being harassed, cast out or just ridiculed when not shaving "properly"; and in a way, being alienated from their own bodies - embarrassed for example to go swimming because of the looks that their hair, their lack of it, or the combinations thereof, cause.

I, too, can count myself among the "victims" of the ideal Western image of womanhood. As a tourist guide I have to look representative, but sometimes I feel like a hypocrite. But when I pondered upon the comments on Sociological Images, most of which had to do with (not) shaving and wearing a bathing suit, I also pondered on the fact, that when dressed in a bathing suit, I am very aware of myself, and the times when I really enjoyed myself swimming or on the beach as an adult have all been times when I went to an FKK (Freikörperkultur, German for naturalist, or "Free Body Culture") place.

On an naturalist beach, no-one tries to show off the latest fashion. In fact, surprisingly enough to most people who haven't tried it on: naturalism is much more "modest" in a sense than being in bathing suit. Most regular bathing suits are not mere tools for enjoying a day of swimming and basking in the sun: they are a matter of sexualising the wearer (stressing certain features in their body, namely the ones they are supposed to cover); and of course, they represent fashion choices, fashion awareness, class, and so on. Naturalism shed you off (literally) of all of that. Suddenly you don't worry any more about varicose veins or stray hairs: you find out that 99% of us don't look like porn stars. That is, if you look - but the whole idea, at least in the places I've been to, is that no-one looks. Your body is for you to enjoy, not for others to stare at...

Under my hat as a tourist guide I am sometimes encountered with questions about FKK in Berlin. Some people seem to have the idea that they're in for a free nude show, others are quite embarrassed by "those Europeans" that also go to the Sauna or to thermal baths naked. In fact, FKK has an interesting socio-political history in Germany, well beyond my anti-consumerist notions of having fun.

The first political association of naturaists in Germany was their involvement in the Reformbewegung of the 19th Century. While the Lebensreform movement was not a political movement per se, it represented a German counter-response to industrialisation and modernity: return to nature, and sometimes also to nationalist/"Völkisch" ideas.


Early beginnings: Nudity in the Lebensreformbewegung

Some members of the Reformbewegung's have later found themselves siding with the Nazis. One of the most prominent of which was the naturalist Hans Surén, who was arrested by the Nazis in 1941 for what the Nazis claimed was public masturbation. However, the Nazis were in fact divided in the reaction to FKK. On the one hand, the nudity of the healthy, athletic, Aryan body was part of Nazi propaganda celebrating the nation. However, the authorities have in fact attempted to oppress naturalism and to ban it, although in 1942 they mellowed (as a response to popular demand?) and set a rule, that clubs may have naturalist areas, away from the view of non-naturalists. So while the FKK could have match the racial theories like a glove, with their obsession of the body, this was not the case.

After the War, FKK became, surprising as it may seem, a political issue. In the communist East, it has become increasingly popular, partially because of the population's general retreat to "small revolts" in the personal sphere. In the West, it was much less popular, not only because conservative organisations like the churches had much more say on the matter, but also because it was not the "forbidden permitted" - those small things that enabled the East Germans to express their personality under the strict communist regime. The regime itself was not very happy about FKK at the beginning - being communists didn't make them less prude or conservative - but later learned, that it would be better to co-opt FKK then to ban it.

For the West Germans, it became one more strange thing in East German culture, and after the Fall of the Wall, many FKK resorts in former East Germany had to close, after holidaymakers were harassed by the newcomers from the West. However, this Wessi reaction brought about a new socio-political meaning to FKK: naturalism became now one other way to assert your "Ossi" identity. In one FKK beach I was in Berlin during election time, the PDS - the fortmer communist party at the time - was handing out stickers.


Naked East-Berliners making no fuss about themselves, but being very political at the same time, in the summer before the Wall fell (July 1989)


Naturally, besides the East-West connotations, FKK is also political by its very assertion that we can rid of our clothing and become "equal", that we can de-sexualise public areas, that we can use public spaces in the same way that most use only their very private sphere, and so on. According to this article in Die Welt, over 800,000 Germans FKK regularly. This is only 1% of the population.

One small side note to this post: all of the pictures here have been taken from Wikipedia. There are major differences between the pictures about naturalism in the German and in the English language Wikipedia. While the first has many pictures featuring front body nudity, the latter has managed somehow to find pictures in which one cannot see sex organs or ones which are of "artistic merits" of a kind. I am pretty sure someone has already done it, but if not - it is interesting to compare the reactions to nudity and similar issues in different Wikipedias.

Saturday, 13 February 2010

Muslim Women Presenting Themselves on a Dating Sites

An interesting discussion about Burqas in Sociological Images (a blog, which I have already mentioned in each and every post in the short life of this blog...) brought me into wondering, how do young Muslimahs (Muslim women) prefer to present themselves online, especially in online dating sites?

For many in the West, the headscarf (and more than that, full face covering, as in the case of Burqa or Niqab) epitomise the way Muslims look like. However, this is not always the case. Muslims come in all shapes and sizes, and accordingly, while some would think that the Burqini is an ingenious idea, others will abhor the idea of women going to swim in public, mixed sex places and other yet will abhor the idea that this might set a standard for Muslim women to dress while swimming.

Muslim women present themselves online, too, in all "shapes and sizes". I went through the pictures of some 1000 women on the online dating site Muslima.com to examine this. Even if you dismiss few of the pictures or the descriptions as false or as bad jokes planted there by non-Muslims (or critics of Islamism, like this one), most pictures and descriptions seem genuine enough. The women on the site come from all over the world, and in fact, few are not single, but continue their membership after being married, searching "friendship" with fellow Muslims. Each profile includes a variety of answers to questions about personal appearance, personal status, the level of religiosity, occupation, whether the member would want to have children, and similar questions that may be found in dating sites. Few are quintessentially "Muslims-only" questions - which Muslim denomination the member belongs to (Sunni, Shi'ite. etc.), whether they eat Helal only food, whether they pray daily, and for women - whether or not they wear hijab (head/neck scarf) and/or niqab (covering also the face or larger parts of the face). Only a few chose to answer that last question.

However, pictures speak louder than words. The pictures we choose to put on our online profiles say something about us, especially in dating sites, where it is almost a "must" to have a picture. Not having a picture on social networks or dating sites is, in itself, a statement about our personality. What we wear, where we are, how we look - these all are expressions of the image we try to reflect with our online persona. In the case of Muslim women on a dating site, the choice whether or not to upload a certain picture, and how to be dressed in the picture, is a choice of the way one is going to present herself to prospective husbands, as well as to the general public browsing through the site.

Muslima.com :
the two models advertising the site, and one of the featured profiles are veiled;
most profiles aren't


On Muslima.com, a little more than 30% of the thousand photos included some sort of head or face covering, with almost all of those (28% of the pictures altogether) presenting a woman in headscarf only (who wouldn't cover her face). A vast majority of the pictures, 68%, were in fact of women without any head, neck or face covering that would identify them as Muslim women. One or two have in fact uploaded quite "revealing" pictures of themselves (in this site's standards): with tank tops, on a trip.

This seems to be similar, as much as I could see, in other Muslim dating sites. Many women have no head covering and most of those who did, had a headscarf.

One can of course claim that the 1000 photos reveal that the type of Muslim women registering in online dating sites would be also the type of women who would not wear a headscarf.

Saturday, 6 February 2010

Obesity and Capitalism

I was sitting in a typical bakery in East Berlin, drooling at all those great looking cakes and pastries. Since I am ridden by guilt by even looking at those things, not mentioning but succumbing to my desires. And I wondered (perhaps in order to put myself off those pastries, which did not work): are there more obese East Germans since 1989?

Obesity is in a way a capitalist disease. We gain weight because we eat fast food that we shouldn't, because we eat less salads and more precooked frozen food. Because we work a lot and have less time. In the former GDR, for example, there were bakeries, of course, and cafes, and confectionaries and even hot dogs stands, but there haven't been so many fast food restaurants, there haven't been so many frozen meals. People ate what they cooked, people took with them a sandwich or an apple, and did not count on the fact that if they're hungry, they can always buy themselves something at the nearest McSomething.

A study done in 2000 revealed my suspicion to be correct: in the years 1985 to 1995, every schoolchild in the former-GDR has gained 2 kilograms in average; and every enlisted young man was 5 kilo heavier. Babies are also heavier and larger (more in German, from the Berliner Zeitung: here)

A study done in 2008 in the German state of Saxony-Anhalt (which is part of the former GDR) has found that in the years between 1990 and 2007, the percentage of obese children and of asthma cases has doubled. Most of the cases are in poorer families. At least one illness is less prevalent since the fall of the Berlin Wall: the cases of bronchitis are reduced from 56,9% to 30,7% (more than half of the communists coughed all the time, and apparently, it wasn't an attempt to encode messages to avoid the Stasi). Saxony-Anhalt was notorious, even in the GDR, as being a polluted state - with the city of Bitterfeld leading the grey lung chart. There is also a huge reduction in smoking in the past 17 years (more in German, from Spiegel in 2008, here)

In the meanwhile, it seems that the poorest German states- the former GDR states - have quickly covered that gap in obesity rates:

Obesity by Bundesland: dark blue in the bottom map: BMI of more than 30 kg/m. Worst states:
  • Saxony Anhalt 28,3% (former GDR)
  • Brandenburg 26,1% (former GDR)
  • Mecklenburg Vorpommerania 25,2% (former GDR)
  • Lower Saxony 24,3% (former BRD, the only one in the top-five list)
  • Thuringia 23,9% (former GDR)

However, it could be worse - from the 50 US states, only 10 measure as "leaner" than Germany's 5 worse states:
  • Colorado 18.5%
  • Massachusetts 20.9 %
  • Connecticut21.0 %
  • Rhode Island 21.5 %
  • Washington DC 21.8%
  • Utah 22.5%
  • Hawaii 22.6 %
  • Vermont 22.7%
  • California 23.7 %
  • New Jersey 22.9%

The "worst" US state, is Mississippi, with 32.8% of the population defined as obese, that is, with BMI higher than 30.

More interesting sociological studies on the social aspects of obesity (not in Germany)
* From the US: Discrimination against the obese (as a way to combat obesity) is on the rise. Because many obese people are also poor, it also raises questions on new forms of exclusion against poor people. And I am also wondering: some people are obese because they have e.g. metabolic problems - are discriminating places going to perfom medical tests on people, to know whether they are obese because they eat junk food or because they have e.g. Cushing's Syndrome?
* From the UK: Obesity is "contagious" , that is - people are more likely to be obese if people around them are.

Monday, 4 January 2010

Die Welt Kompakt's Interesting Marketing Campaign

One of my favourite sociological blogs is Sociological Images, which analyses images (from sociological studies as well as from everyday media and popular culture) in sociological context.

I guess I am an influenced grouppie, and my homage to this blog is my analysis of Die Welt Kompakt's new advertising campaign.

I will start with an instroduction about this newspaper: Welt Kompakt is a relatively new newspaper (est. 2004), which attempts to "summarise" the more comprehensive Welt newspaper into an "underground ride" newspaper. A compact: "serious" newspaper in a "tabloid" format. Although Die Welt Kompakt's publishing house is one of largest in the world (Springer), let alone in the German language sphere, it still felt the need to sell to more readers (there is a problem with WK's readership statistics, since it is counted together with the older, more established, Welt).

Specifically, it tried to appeal to the "Online generation", the one that might read news off their iPhones/Googlephones, the one that is used to interactivity in news comsumption (and not to the relative passive stance of the traditional reading). These are some of the ads in the campaign, whose slogan is "are we mature enough (for a newspaper of our own)?"

The images tell us, of course, a bit about the social/popular culture image of this specific crowd they're after; and in a way - it also excludes those (e.g., people above a certain age, poorer or less literate people) who are beyond in the social networking digital devide


We have so many online friends, that we need a new word for the real ones



We call our moms while checking our mails



We Google the opening hours for the bakery across the street



We register our loved-ones to Facebook